Key finding: across 3,619 analyzed trades, the 45-day disclosure delay costs real returns on every copy-trade. Even so, several politician portfolios (including Pelosi at +23.02% CAGR) still outperform the S&P 500 after the full delay.
The 45-day disclosure window is the most important variable in copy-trading politicians. Every politician we track has a gap between when they trade and when the public finds out. But how much does that gap actually cost?
We analyzed our full dataset, 3,619 trades across 57 wallets, to quantify the real impact.
How long do politicians have to disclose trades?
Under the STOCK Act, members of Congress must disclose trades within 45 days of execution. The actual delay varies:
- Some file within days (faster filers like certain House members)
- Others take the full 45 days
- A few file late (the penalty is only a $200 fine, trivial compared to multi-million dollar trades)
For politician trades, we have both the trade date and the disclosure date in our data. The gap between them is the delay that costs you money.
Looking at Nancy Pelosi’s most recent disclosure (January 23, 2026): she traded AVGO on June 20-24, 2025, but the filing was not published until July 9, 2025, roughly 2-3 weeks of delay. Her AAPL sales from December 24-30, 2025 were not disclosed until January 23, 2026, about 3-4 weeks.
How does the 13F disclosure delay compare?
13F filings work differently. They report positions as of the quarter-end date, with a 45-day filing deadline. A trade made on January 2nd might not appear until May 15th, over 4 months in the worst case.
The delay is fixed and structural: it is always tied to the calendar quarter, not to when the trade actually happened.
What does the disclosure delay cost in real returns?
The delay matters because of two effects:
1. Price movement during the gap
Between the trade date and disclosure date, the stock can move significantly. If a politician bought at $100 and the stock is at $115 when you find out, you are already down 15% compared to their entry. Your copy-trade starts at $115, not $100.
For Pelosi’s portfolio, the 1-year copy-trade CAGR is +23.02%. That is strong, but it is the disclosure-date return. Her actual returns (buying at trade date) would be meaningfully higher. The difference is the “delay cost.”
2. Signal decay
Some trades work because of timing. A politician buying before an earnings beat or policy announcement captures value that may be fully priced in by disclosure. The information embedded in the trade decays over the 45-day window.
This effect is harder to quantify, but it explains why some trades that look brilliant at trade date look mediocre by disclosure date.
How does the delay affect different politician portfolios?
The delay affects concentrated portfolios differently than diversified ones:
| Wallet | 1Y CAGR | Risk | Trades | Delay impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ashley Moody | +76.51% | 0.24 | 14 | High: semiconductor momentum trades lose edge quickly |
| Fetterman | +73.07% | 0.12 | 1 | Low: single long-term hold, delay barely matters |
| Pelosi | +23.02% | 0.28 | 117 | Medium: frequent trading means constant delay exposure |
| Buffett | +7.14% | 0.17 | 179 | Low: long holding periods, the 45-day lag is noise |
Key insight: The delay hurts momentum traders most and long-term holders least. Fetterman’s single GOOG position (+73.07%) does not care about a 3-week delay because the thesis plays out over months. Ashley Moody’s semiconductor trades (+76.51%) are more time-sensitive. The same trades entered 45 days later would likely return less.
Buffett is the extreme example on the institutional side. His average holding period is measured in years. The quarterly 13F delay is barely a rounding error for someone holding Coca-Cola since 1988.
Politicians vs 13F filers: which delay is worse?
| Factor | Politicians | 13F funds |
|---|---|---|
| Max delay | 45 days | ~135 days (trade in month 1, disclosed month 4.5) |
| Typical delay | 2-4 weeks | 6-10 weeks |
| Trade-level data | Yes (each trade disclosed) | No (only quarter-end snapshot) |
| Frequency | Per-trade | Quarterly |
The 13F delay is structurally worse. Politicians disclose individual trades; 13F filers disclose quarter-end snapshots. A hedge fund could buy in January, sell in February, and the January 13F would show the position as of March 31. You would never know about the February exit until the June filing.
This is why copy-trading politicians often shows better results than copy-trading 13F filers. The data is more granular and the delay is shorter.
How to minimize the disclosure delay cost
You cannot eliminate the delay, but you can reduce its impact:
-
Get alerts immediately. The moment a disclosure drops, act (or at least evaluate). The difference between seeing a filing on day 1 versus day 5 can matter. This is what we built TrueWallet to do.
-
Favor long-term holders. Fetterman-style buy-and-hold positions are less delay-sensitive than Pelosi-style active trading. The thesis has time to play out regardless of your entry timing.
-
Evaluate at current price. Do not blindly buy because a politician bought 30 days ago. Ask: “At today’s price, does this still make sense?” Sometimes the answer is no.
-
Watch for recurring buys. When a politician adds to the same position across multiple filings (Pelosi buying NVDA repeatedly throughout 2024-2025), the delay matters less because you have multiple entry opportunities.
If you are based in Europe and looking for an easy way to follow these trades, see our European autopilot alternative.
The bottom line
The disclosure delay is real and it costs real money. Our data across 3,619 trades confirms that copy-trade returns are systematically lower than the politicians’ actual returns. But “lower” does not mean “bad”. Pelosi’s copy-trade CAGR is still +23.02%, well above the S&P 500.
The delay is a tax on copy-trading, not a dealbreaker. Understanding it, accounting for it, and building strategies around it is what separates informed followers from blind copiers.
For the legal framework behind the delay, see our STOCK Act explainer. For a broader overview, check the congressional stock trading guide.
Frequently asked questions
How long do politicians have to disclose stock trades?
Under the STOCK Act, members of Congress must disclose stock trades within 45 days. In practice, many file even later, with the penalty for late disclosure being only $200.
Does the disclosure delay matter for copy-trading?
Yes. Our analysis of 3,619 trades shows that the delay costs real returns. However, even after accounting for the full delay, several politician portfolios still outperform the S&P 500.
What is the 45-day rule for congressional trades?
The STOCK Act requires members of Congress to publicly disclose any stock trade within 45 days of execution. This creates a window where politicians trade before the public can see what they bought or sold.
